POLLUTION OF MARINE SANDS OF THE ODESSA AGGLOMERATION

Authors

  • S.Ye. Dyatlov
  • S.O. Zaporozhets
  • L.Yu. Sekundyak
  • O.V. Kirsanova

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47143/1684-1557/2020.1.02

Keywords:

granulometric composition, microplastic, petroleum products, organic carbon, sea sands, Odessa agglomeration

Abstract

The studies were carried out on the following sea sands of the Odessa agglomeration: beach of Rybakivka, the sand bar of the Tiligul Liman, beaches of Grygorivka, Vapnyarka, Lusanivka, Dolphin, Starik, and the beach of Chornomorsk. Fractions 0.25–0.50 mm – 38.55±6.90 % and 0.50–1.00 mm – 25.35±4.49 % prevailed in samples of 100 g of sand. On the Luzanivka beach it was found the largest number of particles: microplastics (600), slag (75), dye (50), coal (30), rust (10). On the Grigorivka beach the number of microplastic particles per sample was 92, while on the other beaches their number ranged from 0 to 22. The highest content of white spherical microplastic was found on the Lusanivka beach in the 0.25–0.50 mm fraction (35) and in the <0.1 mm fraction (26). On Starik beach it was present in a noticeable amount in the fraction 0.5–1.0 mm (15) and in the fraction 0.10–0.25 mm (14). This type of microplastic was also found in the fraction of 0.25–0.50 mm on the beach of Rybakivka (22) and on the sand bar of Tiligul liman (21). Small amount of black microplastic was found on all beaches, with its maximum content on the beach of Vapnyarka in a fraction of 0.50–1.00 mm (6). Gray fiber was found only on two beaches, the Grygorivka beach (23) and on the sand bar of the Tiligul (7) in the 0.5–1.0 mm fraction. A significant amount of red fiber was found only on the Grygorivka beach in the 0.1–0.25 mm fraction (23) and on the sand bar of the Tiligul in the 0.5–1.0 mm fraction (8). Blue microplastic was found only on the beach of Chornomorsk in the fraction <0.1 mm. The largest amount of white fiber was found in the 0.1–0.25 mm fraction on the Lusanivka beach (23) and on the Grygorivka beach (16). Black microplastic and green fiber were found on several beaches in a minimal amount.

References

ДСТУ 4289:2004. Якість ґрунту. Методи визначення органічної речовини. Видання офіційне. Київ: Держпоживстандарт України, 2005. – 14 с.

Козловский, Н.В., и Я.Ю. Блиновская. 2015. “Микропластик – макропроблема Мирового океана. ” Международный журнал прикладных и фундаментальных исследований 10-1: 159-162.

Ивлиева, О.В., и Л.Н. Фроленко. 2003. “Закономерности распределения техногенных примесей и донных биоценозов в прибрежной зоне моря (побережье Таганрогского залива г. Таганрог – коса Кривая). ” Известия вузов Северо-Кавказского региона. Естественные науки 1: 87-93.

Методические указания по определению токсических веществ в морских донных отложениях. № 43. Москва: Гидрометеоиздат.

Итоги грузоперевалки за 2016 год в морских портах Украины. Available at: http://www.uspa.gov.ua/ru/presstsentr/analitika/analitika-2016 [Accessed 28 November, 2018].

Рухин, Л.Б. 1991. Основы литологии. Ленинград: Гостоптехиздат. 1979.

Chracterization and Analysis of Microplastics. 2017. / Ed. By T. Rocha-Santos and A. C. Duarte. Comprehensive Analytical Chemistry. – Vol. 75. Oxford. Exselvier. – 286 p.

Crawford, C.B., and B. Quinn. 2017. Microplastic Pollutans. Cambridge. Exselvier. – 315 p.

Palatinus, A., M.K. Viršek, and E. Kaberi. “DeFishGear protocol for sea surface and beach sediment sampling and sample analysis”, Available at: http://mio-ecsde.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Protocols-sea-surfacebeachsediments-Feb15.pdf [Accessed February, 2015].

Kungskulnity, N., N. Charoenca, L.H. Stephen, S.I. Hamann, S. Pitayrangsarit, and J. Mock. 2018. “Cigarette Waste in Popular Beaches in Thailand: High Density that Demand Environmental Action. ” Int. J. of Environmental Research and Public Health 15:1-12.

Published

2023-05-10