EVALUATION OF REPRODUCIBILITY AND RELIABILITY OF BENTHIC DIATOMS SPECIES COMPOSITION AT COASTAL LOCATION OF SW CRIMEA

Authors

  • A. N. Petrov
  • E. L. Nevrova

Keywords:

benthic diatoms, Bacillariophyta, species diversity, species accumulation curves, estimation methodol-ogy, Black Sea

Abstract

Benthic diatoms species richness analysis had been conducted at near shore location (S = 0.8 km2) nearby mouth of r. Belbek (SW Crimea, Black Sea). Totally 10 stations (by 6 replicates per each ones) were sampled in November 2009 on sandy-muddy substrate within depth range 6 – 19 m. At total, 267 diatom species were found by microscoping of permanent slides. The share of mass species consisted 26.0 – 74.4 % of total species number registered for each station. Comparative assessment of the diatom expected species richness (Sexp) was performed by results of 4 estimators (Jack-knife-1 & 2, Chao-2 and Karakassis-S). Estimator S had shown the most precise evaluation of Sexp values. The other estimators displayed more overestimated results of the Sexp (32 to 47 % higher than Sobs). One any sample is required in order to reveal about 35 % of the species, 2 samples are required to include in the data set about 50 % of the species. To reveal 80 % of species, more than 6 samples are required. The statistical assessment of the results reproducibility of diatoms species composition under comparison of 6 independent replicates (taken from each of 10 sampling stations) was performed and the reliability of differences between different stations was also evaluated. The average species similarity coefficient for any pair of samples from the same station was significantly higher (1.6 – 2.5 times) than the similarity coefficient between any pair of samples taken from different stations. The differences in diatom species richness between any replicates from the same station were non-significant.

References

Гусляков Н. Е., Закордонец О. А., Герасимюк В. П. Атлас диатомовых водорослей бентоса северо-западной части Черного моря и прилегающих водоемов. – К.: Наук. думка, 1992. – 115 с.

Диатомовый анализ. – М.: Госгеолитиздат,1950. – 3. – 398 с.

Диатомовые водоросли СССР. – Л.: Наука,1974. – 1. – 403 с.

Неврова Е. Л., Ревков Н. К., Петров А. Н. Микрофитобентос / Ред. В. Н. Еремеев, А. В. Гаевская. Современное состояние биоразнообразия прибрежных вод Крыма (Черноморский сектор). – Севастополь: ЭКОСИ-Гидрофизика, 2003. – С. 270 – 282, 288 – 302. 351 – 362.

Петров А. Н., Неврова Е. Л., Малахова Л. В. Многомерный анализ распределения бентосных диатомовых (Bacillariophyta) в поле градиентов абиотических факторов в Севастопольской бухте (Черное море, Крым) // Морск. экол. журн. – 2005. – 4, 3. – С. 65 – 77.

Прошкина-Лавренко А. И. Диатомовые водоросли бентоса Черного моря. – М.-Л.: Изд. АН СССР, 1963. – 243 с.

Brose U., Martinez N. D., Williams R. J. Estimating species richness: sensitivity to sample coverage and insensitivity to spatial patterns // Ecology.–2003. – 84. – P. 143–157.

Cabral H. N, Murta A. G. Effect of sampling design on abundance estimates of benthic invertebrates in environmental monitoring studies // Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. – 2004. – 276. – Р. 19 – 24.

Chao A. Estimating the population-size for capture recapture data with unequal catchability // Biometrics. – 1987. – 43. – Р. 783 – 791.

Clarke K. R. Non-paramentric multivariate analysis of changes in community structure // Austr. Journ. Ecol. – 1993. – 18. – Р. 117-143.

Clarke K. R., Gorley R. N. PRIMER v5: UserManual. Tutorial. – Plymouth: PRIMER-E, 2001.–92 pp.

Colwell R. K., Coddington J. A. Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation // Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Ser. B. – 1994. – 345. – Р. 101 – 118.

Foggo A., Attrill M. J., Frost M. T., Rowden A. A. Estimating marine species richness: an evaluationof six extrapolative techniques // Mar. Ecol. Prog.Ser. – 2003. – 248. – Р. 15 – 26.

Fourtanier E., Kociolek J. P. Catalogue of Diatom Genera // Diatom Research. – 1999. – 14, 1. – Р. 1–190.

Fourtanier E., Kociolek J. P. Catalogue of Diatom Names. – Calif. Acad. Sci., Online Version.Compiled by E. Fourtanier & J. P. Kociolek. –2007. Available online at http:// www.calacademy.org/research/diatoms/names/index.asp.

Gaston K. J. Species richness: measure and measurement. / Ed. Gaston K. J. Biodiversity: biology of numbers and difference. – Oxford: Blackwell Science, 1996. – P. 77 – 113.

Gray J. S. The measurement of marine species diversity, with an application to the benthic fauna of the Norwegian continental shelf // J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. – 2000. – 250. – Р. 23–49.

Hurlbert S. H. The nonconcept of species diversity: a critique and alternative parameters // Ecology. – 1971. – 52. – Р. 577 – 586.

Izsak C., Price A. R. Measuring ß-diversity using a taxonomic similarity index, and its relation to spatial scale // Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. – 2001. – 215. – P. 69 – 77.

Karakassis I. S∞: a new method for calculating macrobenthic species richness // MEPS – 1995. –120. – Р. 299 – 303.

Magurran A. E. Measuring Biological Diversity. – Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2004. – 256 p.

Round F. E., Crawford R. M., Mann D. G. Thediatoms. Biology and morphology of the genera. –Cambridge: Cambridge University press, 1990. –747 pp.

Rumohr H., Karakassis I., Jensen J. N. Estimatingspecies richness, abundance and diversity with 70 macrobenthic replicates in the Western Baltic Sea // Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. – 2001. – 214. – Р. 103–110.

Sanders H. L. Marine benthic diversity: a comparative study // American Nature. – 1968. – 102. – P. 243–282.

Soetaert K., Heip C. Sample-size dependence of diversity indices and the determination of sufficient sample size in a high-diversity deep-sea environment // Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. – 1990. – 59. – Р. 305 – 307.

Tilman D. Distinguishing between the effects of species diversity and species composition // Oikos. – 1997. – 80. – P. 185 – 185.

Ugland K. I., Gray J. S., Ellingsen K. E. The species-accumulation curve and estimation of species richness. // J. Anim. Ecol. – 2003. – 72. – Р. 888 –897.

Ugland K. I., Gray J. S. Estimation of species richness: analysis of the methods developed by Chao and Karakassis // Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. –2004. – 284. – Р. 1 – 8.

Walther B. A., Martin J.-L. Species richness estimation of bird communities: how to control for sampling effort? // Ibis. – 2001. – 143. – Р. 413 –419.

Witkowski A., Lange-Bertalot H., Metzeltin D. Diatom flora of Marine coast 1. Iconographia diatomologica. VII. A.R.G. Gantner Verlag K.G., 2000. – 926 pp.

Published

2023-05-18